Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:53
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sex advice: I'm finally ready to enter my promiscuity era. But there's a catch. - Slate Magazine
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
How can I effectively remove vocals from a song without affecting the music quality?
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Large Bluetooth speaker with style and power - Marshall Tufton in a practical test - Notebookcheck
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Scale of how chronic fatigue syndrome affects patients' blood shown for first time - Medical Xpress
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
6 Best Ways to Take Your Protein Powder, According to Experts - EatingWell
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
We've finally slowed the surge in overdose deaths. The Trump admin may undo all of it - Salon.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.